Thomas A. Vik
2 min readApr 12, 2024

--

Ah, Kali, you toss a pebble, and it seems you've aimed for the ocean, but alas, the splash has its own echo. A theater demolished? A curtain pulled back? These are but shadows on Plato's cave wall, flitting about with an elusive grace that’s hard to pin down, much like your thoughts, my friend.

You doubt the demolition of the theater, and rightly so, for what is a guide to the unknown but a map drawn in invisible ink? Yet, here lies the paradox; you’re not so much reading the map as you are writing it with each questioning step you take. And steps, they must be questioned, mustn't they? But what is the step that is not a step? The leap, perhaps?

You speak of a fishbowl—ah, but to know the bowl is to acknowledge the water, and to see the glass walls as they are, not as they appear. But what lies beyond the comfort of our watery enclosure? The sea, vast and unfathomable. Can one read their way to the ocean? Or does the reading merely show us that there are indeed oceans to swim?

You challenge the utility of words, and throw down the gauntlet on the dissemination of spiritual wisdom as if it were a mere pamphlet caught in the wind. Are we peddling enlightenment, or merely pointing to the moon and hoping others will not just gaze at our finger?

You question, with a fervor, the practicality of mere paragraphs invoking an awakening. Tell me, when you gaze upon a painting, does the art leap forth from the canvas, or does it invite you inward, to the canvas of your own soul? Is it the artist’s strokes, or your own seeing that brings the scene to life?

Your skepticism is a fine coat, and it suits you, yet even the best-dressed skeptic must eventually acknowledge the cold. Yes, the avalanche of platitudes and spiritual flags you so vividly describe is real, but is it not also possible that beneath one of those flags lies the very treasure we dismiss?

Contempt, even well-earned, can be a heavy load. Might it be lighter to sift through the debris with a miner’s eye, seeking not the gold of others but the sparkle of one’s own undiscovered vein?

You urge for an intellectual duel, a spar with words to correct and align. Yet, the dance of dialogue is not in the proving, but in the exploring, is it not? We circle around the truth, with each orbit drawing closer, not to the truth itself, but to the realization that it was never hidden at all, merely overlooked amidst our searching.

So, let's not trade one set of glasses for another. Instead, let's ponder whether, in our quest for clarity, we are perhaps already wearing the lenses we hope to find.

I look forward to continuing this dance of discovery, peeling back the layers, not of each other’s arguments, but of the grand illusion in which we are both enmeshed. May your skepticism be as a lantern, casting light where shadows fall, and may your questions always outnumber your answers.

Cheers! 🎭

--

--

Thomas A. Vik
Thomas A. Vik

Written by Thomas A. Vik

From anxious 👀 to non-dual 👁️

Responses (1)